Ett av de senaste inläggen från http://metagovernment.org/ beslyser vad det handlar om;
Pietro Speroni di Fenizio skrev:Please look at the first graph in this page:
http://vilfredo.org/vhq.php?q=53
The graph url is long but I shorten it to:
http://bit.ly/fd1dKn
Now. Look at the yellow dots, those are the generations where we had a
consensus. The x tells you the generation, the y tells you the number
of people that agreed in that consensus.
We now have 6 moment of full consensus over an history of 16
generations. The 6 consensus happened at generations 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
and 16. And involved 2 people for generations 1, 2, 6 and 16. And 3
people for generation 3 and 5. Then there are all the proposals for
all the other generations. Now the other proposals are just ignored in
this analysis. We only look at the moment of consensus.
Out of those 6 yellow dots, some will stand out. Those are the bright
yellow ones.
And of those 6 consensus, we take the generation 16 (the latest),
which touches 2 people. Then we ignore generation 6, because it is
older and also includes the same number of people. Instead we consider
generation 5 which involved 3 people. And this covers up everything
before.
I am not ranking results that competed one against the other. It is a
different thing. This is why you can speak about percentage (100%,
75%, 25%) which I cannot. Those are all 100%, just 100% in different
moments.
